%PDF-1.7
%
1 0 obj
<>stream
uuid:721015f1-1e35-4692-89de-3a65c090dc7a
adobe:docid:indd:e68f49fc-0e32-11de-bca4-c26e33f1d2e5
xmp.id:C5E1463C1459E411939CFE7D86A90A0C
proof:pdf
xmp.iid:6C9C41280859E411939CFE7D86A90A0C
xmp.did:CF3E2B7E7B53E411B6E0ECE1F92098B7
adobe:docid:indd:e68f49fc-0e32-11de-bca4-c26e33f1d2e5
default
converted
from application/x-indesign to application/pdf
Adobe InDesign CS6 (Windows)
/
2014-10-21T13:20:58+02:00
2014-10-21T13:20:58+02:00
2016-03-31T15:16:55+02:00
2016-03-31T15:16:55+02:00
Adobe InDesign CS6 (Windows)
application/pdf
SICK White Paper - Safety Laser Scanners vs. Safety mats, 8017902
SICK AG | Subject to change without notice
Safety Laser Scanners vs. Safety mats – Which one do I choose?
8017902_WP_Safety-Laser_vs_Safety-Mats_en_20141021_WEB
Adobe PDF Library 10.0.1; modified using iText 5.0.2 (c) 1T3XT BVBA
False
8017902_WP_Safety-Laser_vs_Safety-Mats_en_20141021_WEB
endstream
endobj
2 0 obj
<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ColorSpace<>/Font<>>>/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 792.0]/MediaBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 792.0]/BleedBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 792.0]/ArtBox[0.0 0.0 595.276 792.0]/Annots 12 0 R/Rotate 0>>
endobj
12 0 obj
[13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/A 22 0 R/Rect[377.399 696.162 382.677 684.745]/H/N>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/A 23 0 R/Rect[377.399 672.292 382.677 660.875]/H/N>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/A 24 0 R/Rect[377.399 648.422 382.677 637.005]/H/N>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/A 25 0 R/Rect[377.399 636.508 382.677 625.07]/H/N>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/A 26 0 R/Rect[377.399 624.573 382.677 613.135]/H/N>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>/A 27 0 R/Rect[377.399 612.638 382.677 601.2]/H/N>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>/A 28 0 R/Rect[377.399 600.703 382.677 589.265]/H/N>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>/A 29 0 R/Rect[377.399 576.812 382.677 565.395]/H/N>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>/A 30 0 R/Rect[377.399 552.942 382.677 541.525]/H/N>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>stream
Ūx8\U;# *W